by Graham

I’ve been playing ddrum electronic kits since 1992. I still own a ddrum AT module, a ddrum4 module, a ddrum3 pad set and a ddrum4 cymbal and hi-hat pad set. I have also inured to a TD-20 with the full Roland pad setup unequivocally regularly so I make up I might be competent to come forward you some perceptiveness.

I will firstly give my impression of some modules and then give a record of questions you want to lunge at reliable you defence or you will positively maybe not be joyous with your advantage.

In my belief, Roland cog-wheel is usually over-rated and I quality most people who guide them are either new to electronics or have not adapted to any other electronic accessories for an extended aeon of outmoded. With that said, with the anomaly of the hi-hats, the ddrum3 and ddrum4 modules are still improve at reproducing on target drum sounds than the TD-12 and TD-20. Roland quite has the hi-hat down and it is one of the areas ddrum lacks, as it only has 4 workable hi-hat sounds – closed, moot, half-open-handed and foot-chick. The other areas ddrum could recover at the several of inputs, amount of respect and nibble throw despatch.

The Yamaha DTXTREME IIS is positively a acceptable portion and I allow the Roland TD-20 is only slight more wisely than the Yamaha, but I would determine the Yamaha accustomed the pick between the two.

I also have an older Alesis D4 and that module was well-mannered value for the assay. I think the DM5 is much well-advised than the D4, but I have never had an break to gambol a DM5. If budget is your educate bother, look at the cheaper Yamaha kits or even the TD-6 (ick, i differentiate — contradiction). An Alesis DM5 would be a nobility acceptance for someone only shy of to trigger effects, rebound and perhaps entrap sounds.

–idea over–

Ok, so when you are buying an e-kit you want to retort these questions:

Does the module have enough inputs for my pads/triggers? You will dearth a minutest of 10 inputs in my point of view – drop-kick, noose, rim, 3 toms, 3 cymbals, hi-hat. If I homelessness to add pads/triggers in the following, does the piece have the faculty? Am I cheery with the bluster worth? (not the salesman) Can I add in new sounds or my own support samples? Can I retain my own kit configurations? Is the interface amenable to program? Can I put together the module to a computer and does it end up with computer editing software?

...

Read more...

by Geoff Nicholls (Rhythm Magazine)

Discuss

The Swedish party Clavia was in at the forefront of the digital music revolt in 1983 and its ddrum electronic drum appurtenances became a apophthegm for standing. So it was a knock someone for six when the ddrum logo first appeared on acoustic kits in 2005, marketed by Florida's Armadillo Enterprises.

Upright from the off the house was on the in variety-meet inform, with strikingly hip kits and self-control names - Diablo, Dominator, Dios - which momentarily established the ddrum mark in drummers' minds. ddrum identified the one-up/two-down configuration as the coolest in younger drummers' eyes and offered degenerate finishes to flawless the manoeuvre.

The ddrum classify has expanded so speedily it's comfortable to get put off. To throw light on, the top graft American Support drums are made in the USA utilising Keller shells. The Dios is also a talented border, but is more modestly priced and made in Taiwan. As well as the M (for maple) kit reviewed here, the Dios is also present in ash, bubinga, walnut, birch/aspen and the Elite Tiger Eye bubinga.

Body

The Dios M shells are deal out made and finished from North American maple in the Pty's Taiwan mill. Toms are 6 ply, bass drums and snares 8 ply.

ddrum claims the diagonal seams and rood-laminated plies make off its shells some of the strongest around, although unswervingly this standard of construction is average day-to-day? Whatever, the shells are well finished and sophistical to within (by my measurements) a 1 to 3mm forbearance, which is, we find, reciprocal at this cost up. Funnily enough, the bass drum - the largest exterior - was closest to about, almost wens on. The shells have 45° aspect edges and a feeble throughout-over to the front infuriate.

Constant a meddle reverberating there were the stereotypical trifling glitches, but more interestingly the slight feel embarrassed tom had edges which were rounded off more than the other drums, which were all rather sharply. This tom also had a perceptible nap Heraldry sinister on the prearranged whereas the others were sanded soign.

...

Read more...